首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessing habitat quality of farm-dwelling house sparrows in different agricultural landscapes.
【2h】

Assessing habitat quality of farm-dwelling house sparrows in different agricultural landscapes.

机译:评估不同农业景观中农户麻雀的栖息地质量。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Having historically been abundant throughout Europe, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) has in recent decades suffered severe population declines in many urban and rural areas. The decline in rural environments is believed to be caused by agricultural intensification, which has resulted in landscape simplification. We used giving-up densities (GUDs) of house sparrows feeding in artificial food patches placed in farmlands of southern Sweden to determine habitat quality during the breeding season at two different spatial scales: the landscape and the patch scale. At the landscape scale, GUDs were lower on farms in homogeneous landscapes dominated by crop production compared to more heterogeneous landscapes with mixed farming or animal husbandry. At the patch level, feeding patches with a higher predation risk (caused by fitting a wall to the patch to obstruct vigilance) had higher GUDs. In addition, GUDs were positively related to population size, which strongly implies that GUDs reflect habitat quality. However, the increase followed different patterns in homogeneous and heterogeneous landscapes, indicating differing population limiting mechanisms in these two environments. We found no effect of the interaction between patch type and landscape type, suggesting that predation risk was similar in both landscape types. Thus, our study suggests that simplified landscapes constitute a poorer feeding environment for house sparrows during breeding, that the population-regulating mechanisms in the landscapes differ, but that predation risk is the same across the landscape types.
机译:麻雀(Passer domesticus)在整个欧洲历史悠久,近几十年来在许多城市和农村地区遭受严重的人口下降。人们认为农村环境的下降是由于农业集约化造成的,这导致了景观的简化。我们使用麻雀的放弃密度(GUDs)喂养瑞典南部农田中放置的人工食物斑块来确定繁殖季节在两个不同空间尺度上的栖息地质量:景观和斑块尺度。在景观尺度上,与以农耕或畜牧业为主的异质景观相比,在以作物生产为主的同质景观中,农场的GUD较低。在斑块水平上,喂食具有更高捕食风险的斑块(是由于将壁安装在斑块上以保持警惕而引起)具有较高的GUD。此外,GUD与种群数量呈正相关,这强烈暗示GUD反映了栖息地质量。但是,这种增加遵循的是同质和异质景观的不同模式,这表明在这两种环境中不同的种群限制机制。我们发现斑块类型和景观类型之间的交互作用没有影响,表明两种景观类型中的捕食风险相似。因此,我们的研究表明,在繁育过程中,简化的景观构成了麻雀较差的觅食环境,景观中的种群调控机制不同,但不同景观类型的捕食风险相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号